Month: December 2021

Week 51 Jude

As of today I’ve got twenty-two chapters left to read – the book of Revelation – and I’ve got twelve days left to read them. So that’s an easily-manageable task (assuming I don’t end up intubated in the local hospital).
With the pressure off I’ve been thinking ahead to my bible-reading strategy for 2022. What do I read? There’s the nagging OT vs. NT debate. Dated vs. Up-to-Date. Background vs. Foreground. What’s Coming vs. What’s Here Now. I was thinking about that when I landed on Jude today.
Jude mentions a bunch of OT content in his letter. The reason is that: some godless people have wormed their way in among you, saying that God’s forgiveness allows us to live immoral lives…
That’s a pretty seriously deficient view and to highlight how serious it is Jude compares these NT creepers to a) rebellious Israel b) fallen angels c) Cain d) Balaam & e) Korah. Since I’ve read the OT I know Jude isn’t complimenting these people when he compares them to some of the notable derelicts in the OT.
Anyway getting back to my decision…I know that just because the NT refers back to the OT doesn’t prove that I should read it this year. It’s more just a reminder to me of something I already figure makes good sense…that I’m in a stronger position if I read the OT than if I don’t.

Note: quote from Jude 4 (NLT).

Week 50 John

I’d finished the last two letters of John before I got a word book to confirm what I was pretty sure about. Out of the ~215 times the word love is used in the bible John accounts for ~70 of them – ~33.56%. Loved is used 36 times in the NT…23 times by John. So I know love is an important word and idea for him.
But I wish John had used a different word than love. The way love is commonly used in Alberta is almost completely different from the way John uses it. There should be two distinct words (if I hear the word black I can’t be expected to think white).
Couple of examples of what John says about love:
…those who obey God’s word really do love him
…we know what real love is because Christ gave up his life for us. And so we also ought to give up our lives
…let us stop just saying we love each another; let us really show it by our actions
…love means doing what God has commanded us.
So John’s love isn’t sexual or romantic and I’m not even sure if emotion or affection are much involved at all. Which changes love a lot. If love is doing things the Lord prefers then love – for me – might mean doing something I don’t even feel like doing. And taking the sensory thrill out of love doesn’t sound like 21st century love at all.

Note: quotes from 1 John 2:5, 3:16, 18 & 2 John 6 (NLT)

Week 50 John

John says: dear friends, do not believe everyone who claims to speak by the Spirit. You must test them to see if the spirit they have comes from God.
The test John’s referring to isn’t to evaluate whether what a guy says makes sense or is logical or is intellectually defensible or is falsifiable or like that. It’s to test-the-spirit behind the talk. And John says the spirit can be tested by asking one question…did divine Christ become a human?
I try breaking the idea down. Let’s say there’s two guys: Guy #1 and Guy #2. Both guys are asked John’s Test Question.
Guy #1 says True – God materialized in Jesus.
Guy #2 says False – Jesus wasn’t divine.
John accounts for the different answers this way…
Guy #1 is animated by the Spirit of God (S#1).
Guy #2 is spurred on by: the spirit of the Antichrist (S#2).
The debate between Guy #1 and Guy #2 is a debate between guys and also a confrontation between the Two Animators – S#1 & S#2.
And John admits that there’s a pretty common-sense explanation for why Guy #2 (and therefore S#2) have a captive audience: these people (the Guy #2 group) belong to this world, so they speak from the world’s viewpoint, and the world listens to them. All are influenced by the same influencer.
John is saying: I can only believe what my animating spirit gives me the capacity to believe. (That’s not a quote but I think it’s more or less what John’s saying.)

Note: quotes from 1 John 4:1, 3 & 5 (NLT)

Week 50 John

John uses the word abide (or abides & abiding) quite a few times. Today I took five minutes to page back and scan the text. I easily found a dozen references to abide. I checked a word book. In the whole bible abide abides & abiding are used 67 times. In his gospel and letters John accounts for 43 of the 67 – about 64.18%.
I wonder about the word abide. It’s a kind of old-fashioned word but not so dated that it’s indecipherable. It basically means lasting for a long time. Not changing over time.
John uses abide in a couple of different ways but the usage I’m interested in is the one about me-abiding-in-God. John uses it that way several times. For example:
you will abide in the Son and the Father
you abide in Him
we abide in Him
The idea is that when I come into belief in the Lord then from now on I stick with him. I abide. I settle in for the long haul. Undeviating persistence. Come-what-may endurance. I last.
I checked a different version of the bible and it said living-in-God instead of abiding-in-God. I can’t argue with that. But I prefer abide. Living-in-God seems passive…kind of inertial…relaxed. But abiding feels active. Like it’s mine to do. To stick-with or quit.
Reading John’s letters the last couple of days haven’t given me the sense John was a low-demand guy. And I don’t get the sense abiding is a low-demand task.

Note: quotes from 1 John 2:24 2:28, 3:24, 4:13 (NASB)

Week 50 John

John says: do not believe everyone who claims to speak by the Spirit.
That sounds like if I’m a believer then I have to believe…and I also have to doubt.
The reason John tells me not to believe everything is because: there are many false prophets in the world.
I get a scrap of paper and on the top-left write GOD and a bunch of x’s flowing down the page toward Stick-figure Me at the bottom – Truths coming from the Lord. On the right-side I pencil-in WORLD (and the subtitle False-Prophets) with a stream of y’s coming at me – Non-Truths. And John says I have to test all of them.
My sheet of paper has a cascade of x’s and y’s streaming down on me and I have to test them…make some distinctions…discriminate…accept-reject. Not the easiest thing to do.
John’s advice is to go to the source. I have a Truth Source and a Non-Truth Source and John says: if (the source) acknowledges that Jesus Christ became a human being, that person has the Spirit of God. If (the source) does not acknowledge Jesus, that person is not from God.
So John’s base-level test for examining the flood of Truths & Non-Truths that wash over me all day long is this: does the source believe that the Lord Christ came to earth in material form from God.
There’s more to it but this is the place where I start.

Note: quotes from 1 John 4:1, 2, 3 (NLT)

Week 50 Peter

Peter starts by talking about one of the restrictions that’s applied when it comes to believing in the Lord. It’s that I can’t be both a believer and at the same time be a material-things-are-everything guy. Peter wrote: you love (the Lord) even though you have never seen him. Though you do not see him, you trust him…Your reward for trusting him will be the salvation of your souls… (which also means that being a material-things-are-everything guy has limitations).
Anyway what really caught my attention was Peter’s comment about the OT prophets who forecasted NT events long before they happened: this salvation was something the prophets wanted to know more about…they had many questions as to what it could all mean…They wondered what the Spirit of Christ within them was talking about…They wondered when and to whom all this would happen.
I need to keep this in mind next year when I’m reading the OT…to remember that when the OT writers like Isaiah and Daniel were making their long-range forecasts:
a) they really didn’t know details of how those things would play-out
b) they knew very well they were forecasting in the dark
c) the not-knowing gap perplexed them and they tried to dope it out
d) but they lived and died wondering.
There are lots of things I don’t really understand while I’m reading-through. So it’s a small consolation to know that some of the writers didn’t either.

Note: quotes from 1 Peter 1:8-9, 10-11 (NLT)

Week 49 James

James says that: God blesses people who patiently endure testing.
So it looks like I won’t be blessed (whatever-all benefits that includes) if I don’t apply Endurance Management Principles when I’m confronted with a personal trial.
Even though it’s a pretty counterintuitive-sounding rule that’s not my concern right now. My question is: assuming it is true…how do I exercise patience under pressure? I look at the text for clues. James has a couple.
First he says don’t blame God for the problem.
He follows that up by saying that if I’m looking to blame I’d best look at myself. I don’t know what-all is included in this look-at-myself inventory but one example James uses is lust. He says the problem is that I can fall in love with lust. I can let lust – James uses a kind of psycho-sexual analogy – impregnate me. Once the intercourse is done lust perpetuates itself with its own life cycle of conception-birth-life-death. I think James’ point is that I’m so intimate with my lust that I’d never think to blame it for my troubles.
Finally James circles back to point one and says don’t be misled into thinking that I can  blame God. That won’t fly.
It looks like James’ three pieces of advice for managing trials merge into one pretty big caution about who I start pointing fingers at  when things are going badly.

Note: quote from James 1:12 (NLT); and see 1:13-18.

Week 49 Hebrews

Hebrews begins: long ago God spoke many times and in many ways to our ancestors through the prophets. But now in these final days, he has spoken to us through his Son.
There was a Before Communication.
There was an After Communication.
So…two blocks of Communication Activity (CA). CA#1 came via the OT Prophets. CA#2 came via the Lord Jesus Christ.
In verses three-four the writer lists five or six qualifications to show how vastly superior Christ was to the Prophets. I respect Abraham Moses David Jeremiah & Daniel but Hebrews says that the Lord was way better.
So that raises an interesting question for a bible-reader. If CA#2 is way better than CA#1 then do I really need to read CA#1?
It’s a good question for me to think about now since 2022 starts in three weeks. Do I need to bother reading CA#1?
The way I see it right now is this. If Hebrews 1:3 said something like: “Therefore Please Disregard All Previous Communication Activity from the OT” then I’d feel ok about skipping it. But it doesn’t.
And the other thing is a purely practical one. I read the bible to find out what I can about the Lord. Hebrews isn’t saying that what the OT says about the Lord is inaccurate. The evolution from the OT to the NT didn’t alter the Lord (for example didn’t change him from good to bad). So I figure why wouldn’t I read it?

Note: quote from Hebrews 1:1-2 (NLT)

Week 49 Hebrews

Four years ago I read that the book of Hebrews maybe wasn’t a letter…not to begin with. It was a public sermon. So – the guy said – Hebrews might be more understandable if it was read all-at-once (and even out-loud) – just like a sermon.
I tried that before. I’ve got a note in my bible that says I read through Hebrews in 45-minutes in 2017.
This year I decided to read Hebrews all-at-once again (but not out-loud) and so I got a kitchen timer and set it to 60-minutes.
One thing I noticed was that the audience must have been very familiar with the OT. I’d be guessing to say they must have been Jewish but it’s hard to imagine the OT-heavy content grabbing the attention of a non-Jewish group.
The other thing I noticed was that the audience must have been mostly people who believed in the Lord. But – and this is the thing that I kept seeing – some of them had gotten disenchanted with the Lord…disappointed…were having second thoughts.
So part of the discussion in Hebrews was: what happens when I get tired of the Lord?
It’s a pretty important question when you get right down to it. A pretty big decision.

Note: I think I saw the “Hebrews-is-a-sermon” idea in the Catholic Study Bible (I’m not absolutely sure since I’m here and the CSB is sitting on a shelf in the Medicine Hat Public Library). Note 2: my 2021 reading time for Hebrews was 1:00:09.

Week 49 Philemon

The story of Onesimus is pretty interesting because it talks about what happens when a person believes. The basic thing here in Philemon is that both nothing and something happens.
Onesimus was a slave before he heard the gospel story. And then after he heard & believed he was still a slave. So that didn’t change.
What did change was that after he believed – even though he was still a slave – he was also now more than a slave (in the sense that a whole new department or division had been added onto his life). His expanded life had a bunch of brand-new elements…but it still included his old-life. So it was an inclusionary brand-new life…brand-new by addition…not brand-new by subtraction.
Onesimus was a slave in the first-century Roman political-legal system both before and after he met the Lord. But he’d become a free man in-Christ – a special reclassification outside of the local political-legal regime.
Anyway to further complicate things Onesimus was owned by Philemon. Philemon was a believer. After Onesimus believed Philemon was still his owner. The ticklish thing was that Onesimus’ reclassification gave him an added status – he was now Philemon’s brother.
So this letter from Paul to Philemon is a kind of case-study on fitting Onesimus’ official legal status with his newly-acquired status as a member of the faith. It was perplexing and potentially conflictual. And so it had to be finessed & worked through & developed & thought-out & negotiated.