after success?

Week 9  Deuteronomy 8

Moses was doing a thinking-out-loud exercise about how things would go for Israel once they had moved into Canaan. He projected two alternatives:
Alternative #1 was that once Israel settled-in and got established they would logically just: praise the Lord…for the good land he had given them.
Alternative #2 had a similar beginning but ended differently. In that scenario:
a) Israel would settle-in
b) over time they’d get more prosperous
c) eventually they’d become very successful
d) they’d chalk up their success to hard work & entrepreneurial skills
e) they’d feel good about their achievement. And then they’d…
f) forget about the Lord.
Points a) b) c) d) & e) look like pretty normal steps along the path to personal wealth-building success. But according to Moses the critical intersection was the Point e) because it was the pause-and-think moment: the time to be careful! Beware that in your plenty you do not forget the Lord.
In normal financial-economic thinking Point f) is where Moses goes off-the-rails because he starts bringing a religious idea into the mix. But for him the religious idea was the fundamental underpinning of the whole scheme: it is the Lord your God who gives you power to become rich. Points a) – e) aren’t detachable from Point f). In fact everything rides on it.
No self-respecting financial-advisor is going to move past Point e).
But Moses’ point is that disregarding the fountainhead of prosperity is a mammoth & crucial & lunatic & first-order omission.

Note: quotes from Deuteronomy 8:10,11, 18 (NLT)

under attack

Week 9  Psalm 57

A Sunday prayer for pray-ers in the city on the Dnieper…
Please have mercy on all of us today Lord. And please have mercy on me
We’re surrounded by an army with rifles and tanks…I feel like I’m alone in a boreal forest on a moonless night hearing the howls of a wolf pack getting closer…
Our enemies tricked us…trapped us…isolated us. Now they’re here to take our city…overrun our country…
I’ll do whatever I can under the circumstances…but in the end I know my real refuge and hope is you and I’m going to depend on you until this disaster has passed
Lord…you’re higher than the heavens…you transcend the world
You’re the only sanctuary my soul has
Inside me – in my spirit – I’m confident in you
I’m even going to sing to you…I’m going to get together some instrumentalists and we’ll sing your praises together
I’m certain that your gigantic love is operating
I know your faithfulness outshines everything else
I’m asking you to show us that gigantic love…that excelling faithfulness
Lord…like I said before you’re higher than the heavens…you transcend the world
Please help us. Please rescue us from our adversaries.

Note: this is a reorganized & paraphrased prayer from Psalm 57…put together in this order of verses: 1 4 6 1 5 1 7 7-9 10 3 11 3

nightmare fear

Week 8  Deuteronomy 6

Moses explained an important connection between the Lord and the ten commandments: fear the Lord your God as long as you live by keeping all his decrees and commands. So there’s a link between complying with the 10Cs and with fearing the Lord. I checked three different bibles and they all used the word “fear”. Exactly what the Lord-10C linkage is and how it works is something for the back-burner. Right now the single issue about fearing-the-Lord is more important to me.
I used to have a repeater nightmare where I’d wake up petrifyingly afraid. But when Moses talks about fearing-the-Lord I’m pretty sure it’s not nightmare fear. So if that’s not what it is then what is it?
I checked a fourth bible and it said “deep reverence”. It makes pretty good sense to me to classify fear-of-the-Lord in the same family as reverence. Revering someone might be a subspecies of fear… Subtle or finely-pointed fear… Something more like an excited not-quite-trembling nervous uncertain respectful cautious don’t-want-to-mess-up elevated-heartrate expectant awestruck admirative-verging-on-panic psychically-weighted-with-ominosity and just-don’t-say-anything-stupid veneration. Something like that. Which isn’t happiness. But it’s not nightmare fear. It’s a fear that fits the circumstances.
If I meet someone who’s awesomely and spectacularly superior to me then I start naturally behaving like I’m standing with awesome & spectacular superiority. Which seems like a totally suitable and understandable class of afraidness.

Note: quote from Deuteronomy 6:2 (NIV).

a lot of judges

Week 8  Deuteronomy 1

After Mount Sinai Moses began adjudicating the Sinai laws single-handedly but eventually he realized it wasn’t a one-man job. So he delegated judges who were responsible for subgroups of people – smaller units of 1000s & 100s & 50s & right down to groups of 10.
I got out a calculator. The military census in Numbers said there were about 600,000 men in camp. That meant 60000 judges for groups of 10 & 12000 for 50s & 6000 for 100s & 600 for 1000s. Total = 78600 judges (minimum) (a lot of judges).
With 78600 assistants to help apply the 700 or 800 laws Moses’ labour shortage was solved.
But then the supplementary question cropped up: can my 78600 helpers do the job properly? Answer: not necessarily. Judges are people too. So Moses also introduced a multi-point Character Assessment Test.
It wasn’t about whether the guy was a team-player or had a good sense of humour. Moses’ judges had to have wisdom & good judgment & life experience & impartiality & resistance to influence & reverence for the Lord & honesty & immunity to graft.
Good laws + good-quality judges = an effective legal system.
Good laws + derelict judges = a degraded legal system.
Moses’ laws were good in the abstract. But how real-life-effective were they? About as effective as the character quality of the 78600 judges that adjudicated them.

Note: see Deuteronomy 1:9-18 & Exodus 18:13-27

just like me

Week 8  Psalm 50

Near the end of the psalm the Lord says: you thought that I was just like you. I was thinking today that if I had the ability to make it happen I’d be tempted to make God just like me.
I guess it’s possible I’d make him like someone else. Or maybe a mash-up of several Top Quality People. But I suspect that if it was my choice he’d have a lot of Joe-like qualities.
Because if he was just like me we’d always be on the same page
He’d do things that were consistent with my preferences
Most of the time we’d just naturally agree and when we didn’t we’d be able to reach a consensus pretty readily
I’d probably feel a higher degree of personal liberty if he was like me
He’d be friendly conciliatory affable respectful obliging cooperative altruistic attentive responsive
He’d be a fairly Albertan-style god
There’d have to be some modifications to Bible God – for example his justice couldn’t be so absolute & decisive (in Canada an impartial judiciary is kind of negotiable)
Less demanding & strident. Less certain. Less awesome. Less rigorous. His absolutes would need some paring down. He’d not do objectionable stuff. He’d need to see eye-to-eye with me. There’d have to be an uptick in his flexibility. He’d have to be more like one-of-the-boys.
I’m tempted to think that life would be more manageable if God was just like me.

Note: quote from Psalm 5o:21 (NASB)

two accounts

Week 8  Deuteronomy 1

Right up front Moses retells the story about the 12 spies. It’s a little different from the Numbers 13 version of the same story.
Deuteronomy says the people approached Moses with the idea of infiltration.
Numbers says it was the Lord’s idea.
I wonder if I’ve sniffed out a contradiction. A genuine contradiction might be where one account says “12 spies were sent out” and the other says “no spies were sent out”. So I wonder how this one stacks up.
I look at all my materials from both stories:
a) the Lord spoke to Moses and told him to send out 12 spies (Numbers)
b) Moses did send out 12 spies (Numbers)
c) the people floated the idea to Moses about sending 12 spies (Deuteronomy)
d) Moses thought that was a good idea (Deuteronomy)
e) Moses did send out 12 spies (Deuteronomy).
I rearrange the pieces…
c) the people floated the idea to Moses
d) Moses thought it was a good plan
a) Moses got confirmation from the Lord – who ok’d the covert operation
b) & e) Moses sent the spies.
Shuffling the pieces like this makes pretty good sense to me (if I’d written Deuteronomy the only thing I’d have added to the reordered list – between d) & a) – was that when the people made the suggestion to Moses he ran it by the Lord).
I’m not saying that “this absolutely solves the question”. But the concern is less of a concern for me now.

Note: the two stories are Deuteronomy 1:19-23 & Numbers 13:1-17

one big difference

Week 8  Numbers 23

Lots of times things just inexplicably register in my mind and today something registered inexplicably with me: God is not a man that he should lie. That’s only half the verse but that was the key phrase: God is not a man that he should lie.
Bible-readers read for different reasons but it’s probably a pretty common goal to read the bible to find things out. So the idea that God isn’t like a man since he tells the truth is a pretty useful thing to know.
It’s a contrastive comment. Contrast #1 is that God isn’t a human being. God and human beings aren’t the same.
I can flip-flop it: human beings aren’t the same as God.
I can personalize it: I’m not like God.
It’s a pretty clear-cut distinction: God and I aren’t the same.
Contrast #1 is developed a bit in Contrast #2: God is not a human being that he should lie.
So one specified point of difference between God and me is that he doesn’t lie.
I can flip-flop it: one specified distinction between God and me is that I do lie.
I can personalize it: I’m not like God because I don’t tell the truth.
There’s a number of ways that God is different from me (creative capacity…knowing everything…endless existence…like that) and those are things I can’t really relate to.
But God being different because I don’t have the capacity he does to tell the truth? That I can understand.

Note: quote from Numbers 23:19 (NLT).

more to come

Week 8  Numbers 26

In Numbers 1 there’s a military census of the tribes.
Then in Numbers 26 there’s a second census.
If I’m not paying attention I might think chapter 26 is just a rehash of chapter 1 (or by that time I might have totally forgotten about 1). But 1 & 26 are two different censuses separated by forty years of time spent in the wilderness.
When I was reading 1 about a week ago I was interested in the order the names were listed so I wrote them down on a sheet of lined yellow paper. [Q: what did I discover? Short A: not much! (see ‘lists & lists’ and the Directed Listing Technique).]
Anyway I’d also written down the census numbers beside each name in chapter 1 (e.g. Reuben 46,500) so when I saw more numbers in 26 I figured I’d compare them.
All 603,000 men in List #1 had died. 602,000 had replaced them in List #2.
7 tribes had increased in number.
The Simeon tribe had decreased catastrophically – 37,000 fewer men.
Manasseh had grown by 21,000 – the largest increase.
The biggest tribe in List #1 was Judah…and Judah retained his Number 1 ranking in List #2.
The smallest tribe in List #1 was Manasseh; Simeon the smallest in List #2.
Hmmm…there’s no mental Red Sea opening up for me while I look at these numbers so I’m a bit disappointed. But my expectations weren’t really sky-high to start with. There’s more lists to come. Something might develop.

Note: List #1 is in Numbers 1:20-46 & List #2 in 26:4-51. The census numbers listed here are rounded-up (and don’t quote the stats without double-checking).

remember the donkey

Week 7  Numbers 22-24

The story of Balaam and his donkey is one of my favorites. It’s really Balaam’s story. But even though the donkey is a bit player he’s not just decoration either.
I don’t know for sure what-all Balaam’s special talents were. He was a kind of shaman…maybe a diviner, maybe he could influence events, maybe he could cure illness.
But one thing he definitely had was a reputation for being able to bless or curse people. That’s what Balak needed him for. Cursing.
Balaam had direct communication with the Lord on five different occasions in the story. And in the story’s roughly 96-verses Balaam spoke 28-verses of prophetic blessing that came directly from the Lord. On the surface it looks like Balak is the villain and Balaam the hero – a real man-of-God type guy.
But then I remember the donkey. He had three direct revelations of his own from the Lord. And he miraculously stared talking ‘human’. But that didn’t make him a real donkey-of-God type donkey.
Balaam and his donkey play similar roles – instrumental roles. They both had unusual religious experiences. And they both got some special (temporary) language capacities.
But that’s about as far as it went for both of them. After his conversation with Balaam the donkey reverted to his inarticulated braying. And after his conversations with the Lord and his prophetic blessings Balaam reverted to his normal behaviour – doing what his paymaster wanted in the first place.

judgment calls

Week 7  Numbers 16

The story of Korah Dathan & Abiram and their 250 associates is pretty sobering because the Lord is responsible for the execution of that entire group.
It makes me think about being a bible-reader and I ask myself one key question: do I get to make a judgment call about the Lord’s action? Put another way…do I get to decide whether the Lord acted correctly or incorrectly?
This is an intriguing (and potentially powerful) position to find myself in…deciding whether or not the Lord did wrong.
I figure each bible-reader gets to make that call and it’s a pretty basic one-of-two-options call to make: a) I do get to make my own personal judgment call about what the bible says the Lord does; b) I don’t get to make a judgment call about what the bible says the Lord does.
Personally I can definitely see the appeal of the first option – it puts me in the Driver’s Seat…I Decide for Myself! I tend to think this would make my decision-making in bible-reading a lot simpler.
But for now I’m sticking with the second option – I’ll read the bible and let it tell me what it’s telling me and not me tell it what it’s telling me. Unfortunately there’s a higher degree of difficulty with b) so that means my bible-reading won’t get any simpler.