Month: September 2022

Week 37  Matthew 19

The Lord had a fairly restrictive view on divorce and the disciples wondered if it was better just not to get married. But Jesus pointed out that being single wasn’t the solution since not everyone could live a single (i.e. a non-sexual) life.
The Lord used eunuchs as an example. He said there were three types of eunuchs:
a) eunuchs born with a genital birth defect
b) surgically-altered eunuchs
c) free-choice eunuchs.
For eunuchs a) and eunuchs b) sexual-intercourse was a physical impossibility. Couldn’t be done.
But c) was different. The bible I usually read is a bit vague when it refers to eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs (even if that was the only version I had I’d have serious doubts the Lord was talking about a guy who personally elected to have actual castration surgery). So that’s why another version is clearer when it says that group c) have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven (i.e. they renounced sexual-intercourse). So I take group c) to mean hypothetical-eunuchization where a guy retains functional genitals but doesn’t use them for sexual-intercourse.
The majority view in the modern world is that a life without sexual-intercourse is basically impossible. And the Lord admits that not everyone can accept this teaching. But a minority – those to whom it has been given – have that capacity.
A qualified sub-set of people can live without sexual-intercourse for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.

Note: quotes from Matthew 19:11-12 (NASB & NIV)

Week 36  Matthew 16

The Matthew 16:24-28 paragraph is a pretty sober look-before-you-leap warning that the Lord tells his listeners. Think twice before deciding to follow me (or as he puts it: before you take-up-my-cross).
But what I notice today is that the Lord says that in the end he’ll: reward everyone according to what they have done (another version says ‘recompense’ in place of ‘reward’). The phrase is a quote from a psalm.
The margin also lists a few related references:
Will (the Lord) not repay everyone according to what they have done?
God will repay each person according to what they have done
Each of us will give an account of ourselves to God
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad
The Lord will reward everyone for whatever good they do
Anyone who does wrong will be repaid for their wrongs
Everyone was judged according to what they had done.
The bible-consensus seems to be that the things I’ve done…things that I’m doing…things that I’ll eventually do… they’re all going to be assessed and compensated for in the end.
I get to decide for myself whether I figure a Final Compensation really is in-the-works. But if it is then what I’m doing with myself is worth keeping tabs on.

Note: quotes from Psalm 62:12 Proverbs 24:12 Romans 2:6 Romans 14:12 2 Corinthians 5:10 Ephesians 6:8 Colossians 3:25 Revelation 20:12 (NIV)

Week 36  Matthew 5

In his first long sermon the Lord told his audience something pretty important about himself and about the OT: do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
It wasn’t the Lord’s plan to scrap the OT. He intended to fulfil it. He didn’t figure it was a bad document. But it was an unfulfilled one. Some extra input was needed. Some fulfilling.
Fulfil isn’t an absolutely clear word to me but I think it means something like the OT needed to be completed…brought up to a condition of full realization…totally actualized…carried out…finalized.
At first I thought that fulfilment was explanation and I got that idea because the Lord used the example of murder and said the law against murder needed to include pre-homicide factors like anger jealousy pride envy hatred desire dissatisfaction and like that…explaining that there’s more to murdering someone than just murdering him.
But now I’m not sure that’s the point. The Lord said he’d come to fulfill the OT. Not to explain it (even though he did explain sometimes). To fulfil it.
Did the OT need fulfilling? Apparently. As good as it was as a stand-alone document it wasn’t fully adequate. It needed fulfillment. And whatever-all the Lord Jesus was responsible to do on earth OT-fulfilment was one of  his tasks.

Note: quote from Matthew 5:17 (NASB). Three other versions also said ‘fulfil’. JB Phillips said ‘completed’.

Week 35  Matthew

I get my reminder right away that I’m in a whole new situation.
Between Malachi 4 and Matthew 1 there’s a huge blank in the bible where about four centuries-worth of things have happened – language attitudes currency ideas international-relations social-practices empire-building – and I’m just dropped into that new & different environment. (About the only comparable gap I can think of in the bible is the story of Jacob’s family in Egypt. Between Genesis 50:16 and Exodus 1:1 an awful lot of water has gone over the dam.)
So anyway things start appearing in Matthew that are brand-new. They’re “where-did-this-come-from?” kinds of things.
For example baptism. Where did it come from? Matthew starts talking about it as if I know all about it.
Ditto for the appearance of two groups of people: Pharisees & Sadducees. Who were they? Where did they come from?
Ditto for synagogues. What’s a synagogue and what’s its function?
Finishing Malachi and then starting in on Matthew the next day is like living in a cave along the South Saskatchewan River valley in 1622 and then time-travelling to Medicine Hat in 2022. Things are quite a bit different. And no disrespect intended but Matthew isn’t all that helpful in explaining the changes (though I guess there’s no reason he should. They’re not changes for him).
So as I start into the NT this week I get my reminder that utilizing fewer mental resources isn’t my reward for finishing the OT.

Week 35  Matthew 1

Matthew opens with a list of names of the people in Jesus’ family-tree. While I scan them I realize that I recognize quite a few in the first eleven verses. I couldn’t recite them…but they’re familiar. The only ones that I don’t remember as being part of the family are Amminadab & Nahshon (but I admit that the only reason I recognize Ram & Salmon is the name-link to the animal kingdom).
There are some names I recognize but couldn’t place if they were out-of-context. For example I recognize all the names of the kings of Judah but if someone asked me about Joram or Jotham just out-of-the-blue I wouldn’t know if they were kings of Judah or Israel.
After verse twelve I don’t recognize Abiud Eliakim Azor Zadok Achim Eliud Eleazar Matthan & Jacob (the Zadok & Eleazar & Jacob that I do recognize are different OT characters). The reason I don’t recognize most of the names is because the OT Story pretty much ends with Zerubbabel and the return of exiles from Babylon. If I wanted to find out more about that quiet interval I’d have to go outside the OT. But obviously someone was keeping track of family names during those years and Matthew was able to plug them into chapter one.
I notice that three times Matthew includes the names of wives/moms. But they’re exceptions and I don’t know what to make of them.
And I see that Joseph is highlighted as husband-of-Mary.