words

Week 22 Proverbs

A couple of days ago I was reading the introduction to Proverbs and I wanted to get clarification on the word discipline so I looked at another version of the bible.
One version used the word discipline and the other said instruction. A third version also said discipline (so I wondered if I could use a Majority-Rules rule to break the tie).
I also saw that one version said equity but the other two said fair.
One said clever. The others prudence.
One said purpose. Two: discretion.
But then I saw that all three agreed that: the fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge.
None of them thought up an alternate word for fear. I looked up fear in an old paperback thesaurus and saw things like bad-feeling fright danger anxiety apprehension dread panic. Like that. None of which sound so great.
I’m concerned about fear and I’ve noticed that sometimes my bible has a marginal substitute: revere. Revere adds something to fear. Which is good because I figure there’s something different about fearing the Lord than, say, being terrified by a zombie.
I checked a word book. Fear was used at least 400 times in the OT. More than a hundred of those were about fearing the Lord.
I need to think more about fear. Solomon says that fearing the Lord is a prerequisite to knowledge. Mandatory Step One.
Start with fear…then move on from there.

Note: quote from Proverbs 1:7 (NLT NIV & NASB)

stupid-not stupid

Week 22 Proverbs

I finished reading Nehemiah yesterday. Near the end of the second-last chapter I saw this: for in the days of David and Asaph, in ancient times, there were leaders of the singers, songs of praise and hymns of thanksgiving to God
The reason I mention it is because while I was reading that exact verse I had one of those weird & sudden & unsettling out-of-the-blue questions flash into my mind. It was: why in the world am I reading this book because the whole exercise seems like such a pointless and stupid waste?
The question doesn’t come up too often. Occasionally it just kind of drifts out like a puff of smoke seeping through a crack in the ground from a sulfurous subterranean cave. It’s a here-then-gone question. But it smacks me with a powerful emotional Whap! A disregardable question that’s tough to disregard.
Anyway I started reading Proverbs this morning and in a nice follow-up coincidence Solomon starts out by giving a pretty good answer to my question: why in the world am I reading this because it seems like such a pointless and stupid exercise?
Solomon says: the purpose of these proverbs is to teach people wisdom and discipline, and to help them understand wise sayings. Through these proverbs, people will receive instruction in discipline, good conduct, and doing what is right, just, and fair.
None of which sound pointless and stupid.

Note: quotes from Nehemiah 12:46 (NASB) & Proverbs 1:2-3 (NLT)

a big part

Week 22 Nehemiah

If someone found out I was reading through the bible and he put me on the spot by saying he wanted a brief synopsis of the OT what would I say? Other than: Uhhhhhhh……………………?
If my mental faculties were operating anywhere near full capacity I’d be smart to refer to Nehemiah. In chapter nine there’s a thirty-three verse public prayer & review of history section that covers lots of the major topics – from Genesis 1 to the return of the exiles.
Reading nine this year the thing that really registered was how many times the Lord is mentioned as being the Major Player in Israel’s history. There are thirty-seven references to the Lord doing things all along the way. For example:
You preserve and give life
You displayed miraculous signs
You came down on Mount Sinai
You gave them bread from heaven
You helped our ancestors conquer great kingdoms
You sent them deliverers
You rescued them repeatedly
You sent your Spirit
You showered your goodness on them
Like that.
37-actions in 33-verses. What’s that? 1-action every .9-verses?
Can’t really get around it. If I want to synopsize the OT the Lord’s intervention is a big part of the synopsis.

Note: quotes from Nehemiah 9:6, 10, 13, 15, 22, 27, 28, 30, 35 (NLT). End of month reading note: I finished Nehemiah and the book of Psalms today. My reading total is 931-pages. So I’m staying ahead.

 

 

a different capacity

Week 21 Psalm 148

Psalm Summary: everything that’s created should praise the creator.
On the surface it sounds plausible until you read on a bit and see that the writer included in the Everything category: a) created things that actually have – as far as I can see – the capacity to praise and b) created things that – as far as I can see – lack the capacity.
I can see where an angel has the capacity to praise the Lord. But not a star. I can see that a man has the capacity to praise the Lord. But not hail. I sit wondering what I can do at this border that divides what I think I see from what I don’t.
I have no problem understanding how all created things that can think & communicate can praise the Lord. But the writer names several created things – snow and cedar trees – that cannot think or communicate but that are supposed to praise the Lord.
From my perspective I’m tempted to say definitively that a limestone cliff cannot praise the Lord. But since I don’t know every thing that there is to know maybe I should back up. Maybe a wall of limestone – that can be shown by 21st century detection-technology to be absolutely and totally inanimate and beyond any measurable capacity to communicate – is emanating some kind – a qualitatively different kind – of praise.
I’m not saying limestone hums. I’m just saying I don’t hear it.
But it’s something to keep on the back-burner.

reliable help

Week 21 Psalm 146

Everybody knows that when you’re in a jam it helps to have an influential helper.
So I paused when I got to where it said: don’t put your confidence in powerful people; there is no help for you there.
I’m tempted to think that – in the normal pattern of things – 146:3 should read: put your confidence in powerful people because that’s where you’ll get help. But it doesn’t and this looks like another case where I’m just reading along and I find out that something I figured was reliably true isn’t.
What’s the writer driving at?
Well for one thing he fast-forwards and says this about Currently Powerful People: when their breathing stops, they return to the earth. And he contrasts that with the Lord: the Lord reigns forever.
If I could pin the writer down I wonder whether he might admit that well, technically-speaking a Powerful Person could give you some brief & temporary assistance.
But I’m really not so sure he’s saying even that. I figure maybe he’s coming at it from the viewpoint that the help of powerful people is roughly equivalent to no help at all. After all he did say: there is no help for you there.
The idea seems to be that when you need any kind of help go to someone who can actually help you.

Note: quotes from Psalm 146:3, 4 & 10 (NLT)

well-versed

Week 21 Ezra

When Ezra wrote Ezra he was writing history in chapters 1-6 and then autobiography in 7-10.
1-6 is the story of what happened during the time of Zerubabbel; 7-10 is the story of Ezra – and there’s fifty or sixty years between the two stories (it’s like talking about the Cuban Missile Crisis and then I jump into talking about the new carwash opening next week in Medicine Hat).
Anyway the Ezra-section of Ezra says two pretty interesting things about Ezra. First it says: Ezra was a scribe, well-versed in the law of Moses. Then it says: Ezra had determined to study and obey the law of the Lord and to teach those laws and regulations to the people of Israel.
So that’s a kind of time-lapse synopsis of Ezra:
He was well-versed in the law
He’d decided to study the law
He’d decided to obey the law
He’d decided to teach the law to people.
Those things didn’t happen on consecutive days. At some point – even though he doesn’t explicitly say so – Ezra probably just started by reading-through. Then as he kept reading-through he eventually became well-versed in the law. That right there is an excellent MHJ Reading Goal: keep reading-through until you get well-versed in the bible. Getting well-versed is a significant accomplishment.
Of course Ezra didn’t stop at Well-Versedness. But getting to the well-versed stage was a gigantic step.

Note: quotes from Ezra 7:6 & 10 (NLT)

who did what?

Week 21 Ezra

Chapter four sneaks up on me.
Cyrus the Great had let the exiles return to Jerusalem.
They started rebuilding the temple but in chapter four got stalled by opponents.
Looks like they were stalled through the time of Cyrus…
Stalled through the time of Darius…
Stalled through the time of Xerxes…
Stalled into the time of Artaxerxes.
So it looks.
The way chapter four is written I get the sense that the writer is going through a story of Four Temple Stalls: Cyrus’ then Darius’ then Xerxes’ then Artaxerxes’. One-after-another. But then in chapter six he says the stalled temple rebuild was restarted. And completed by Darius’ sixth year.
I looked up the four rulers online:
Cyrus 559-530 BC
Darius 522-486 BC
Xerxes 486-465 BC
Artaxerxes 465-424 BC
If the temple was built by Darius’ sixth year it was built by about 516. Long before Xerxes and Artaxerxes. Xerxes and Artaxerxes stalled something but not the temple. It was already built. So if I’m thinking that Cyrus & Darius & Xerxes & Artaxerxes all stalled the temple project I need to rethink that.
I wonder why the writer didn’t make it more obvious for me. I don’t figure he was trying to jerk me around. Maybe he decided to group three similar situations (something like: oh, by the way Darius wasn’t the only oppositional episode). Or maybe he thought he had a smarter reader: no problem if I flash-forward. He’s got a brain…He’ll figure it out for himself.

Note: see the stalls in Ezra 4:5-7

relative value

Week 21 Psalm 144

David asks the question: O Lord, what are mortals that you should notice us, mere humans that you should care for us? For we are like a breath of air; our days are like a passing shadow.
I slow down. Tip-toe through this paragraph. It says I’m like a passing shadow. I’m thinking – okay, where does that leave me? What’s a passing shadow worth?
If I’m out on the prairie under a high blue summer sky and the wind is pushing clouds along I might see cloud-shadows off in the distance rushing darkly across the flat bright fields. It’s a pretty nice thing to see and I like it – a kind of visual dynamism. But even though it does register on my Things Worth Paying Attention To Scale it registers near the bottom-end. Here at 3:00:00pm. Gone at 3:00:03pm.
I don’t think David’s point is that – in absolute terms – I’m worthless. I’m not worthless. I’m noticeable. Interesting. There’s a definite worthwhile-ity to me. It’s not like I don’t register on the scale. I have a kind of low-level visual dynamism. But brief. Lightweight. Okay…but not as awesome as I think.
Psalm 144:4 isn’t the only verse in the bible that talks about what people are like.
But it’s the only verse on that topic today.
And when I think about it being told I’m not as awesome as I think is only an insult if it isn’t true.

Note: quote from Psalm 144:3-4 (NLT)

three classes

Week 20 2 Chronicles

Last Monday I decided to group each of the Judah-South kings into one of three classes: Goods-Bads-Middlers. The key question for me was: did the writer say only good things – only bad things – or both good-&-bad things about a king?
I’ve finished reading 2 Chronicles now and the fifteen candidates are: Rehoboam Abijah Asa Jehoshaphat Jehoram Ahaziah Joash Amaziah Uzziah Jotham Ahaz Hezekiah Manasseh Amon & Josiah. [I didn’t include Athaliah because she wasn’t officially coronated. When her son died she just took over – a decisive woman in the right place at the right time. Another thing about Athaliah – she almost eliminated David’s bloodline by killing everyone but Joash.]
So anyway my personal findings are…
Bads: Jehoram Ahaziah Ahaz Amon.
Middlers: Rehoboam Abijah Asa Jehoshaphat Joash Amaziah Uzziah Jotham Hezekiah Manasseh.
Goods: Josiah.
Couple of Comments:
I had Jotham as a Good at first. Then I cross-referenced his story in Kings and bumped him down.
Hezekiah was a star until near the very end when the chronicler says: he became proud. It’s too bad – I’d had him batting a thousand. I counted about 620-verses in the twenty-six divided-kingdom chapters and Hezekiah accounted for 117 of them – almost 19% of the total! Almost all of it admirable. Just one minor brush with pride.
I think all Middlers started well and went astray later on – except Manasseh – a real ogre right out of the starting gate – but he did a one-eighty in the end.

Note: quote from 2 Chronicles 32:25 (NLT).

the final four

Week 20 2 Chronicles

At the beginning of the week I set myself a little mental-focusing exercise. I decided to track and categorize the kings of Judah based on three simple questions. Were they Good Kings – Bad Kings – or Middler Kings?
It seemed like an okay exercise and I guess it was. Of course it slowed me down a bit. And in the end I think the three-category classification scheme oversimplified things. But it concentrated my thinking.
I got flummoxed in chapter 36 though. What to do with those last four kings? I’d figured on Monday to map all the kings from Rehoboam (first king) to Zedekiah (last king). But when I got to chapter 36 I realized that the independent kingdom of Judah was gone by then. Kaput! Did those four reign? Well…yeah. But did they have real power? Uh-uh.
Josiah died in chapter 35 and Jehoahaz replaced him. For three months. Then his guardian the king of Egypt shipped him off to Egypt.
Eliakim (also known as Jehoiakim) replaced Jehoahaz. But Egypt determined his state policies. He was a puppet-king.
Then when Egypt was a replaced in an international rebalance-of-power Babylon attacked Jerusalem. Eliakim? Shipped into exile.
Jehoiachin replaced Eliakim for three months then Nebuchadnezzar replaced him with Zedekiah.
Anyway the point is that I decided not to include these final four plug-in kings in my list of Goods-Bads-Middlers. They weren’t Real Kings. You’re not king-of-your-castle if someone else is.
Tomorrow I’ll submit my Good-Bad-Middler Report.